# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next
- Last updated: October 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Alibaba |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.42 | 64.23 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 24 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 24.6 (Estimated · #97/123)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 59.5 (Estimated · #24/123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CoWorkBench | Coming soon | 73.9% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 55.7% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 73.5% | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 84.5% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 19.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 23 (Supported · #111/146)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 52.4 (Supported · #37/146)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 54.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 62.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 81% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.1% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 58.7% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 91.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 73.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 80.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 74.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 87.7 (#8/54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 64.0% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 72.3% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 76.6% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 90.6% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 84.6% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 90.6% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 45.7 (Supported · #91/177)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 59.4 (Supported · #47/177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | 91.7% | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| HLE | 18.8% | 35.9% | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 35.9% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.8 (#76/127)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 91.2 (#22/127)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 81.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 35.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2024 | 92% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 14.138% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 4.167% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next profile](/models/qwen3-8-flash-next)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)