# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs QwQ-32B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Alibaba |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.12 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 26.4 (Estimated · #98/124)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v3 | Coming soon | 66.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 22.4 (Supported · #113/148)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 54.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v5 | Coming soon | 62.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 73.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 74.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 45.5 (Supported · #94/181)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | 65.6% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| HLE | 18.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Redux | Coming soon | 90% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 88.4% | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | Coming soon | 80.9% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| INCLUDE | Coming soon | 69.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.8 (#77/128)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 83.9% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 36.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2024 | 92% | 79.5% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 24.561% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98% | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 2.5 Pro and QwQ-32B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [QwQ-32B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwq-32b)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-1-sol)
- [QwQ-32B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwq-32b)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [QwQ-32B profile](/models/qwq-32b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)