# Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Sarvam 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Sarvam 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-sarvam-30b
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Sarvam 30B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Sarvam 30B has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Sarvam |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 64K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.14 | 28.61 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 9 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 25.7 (Estimated · #102/128)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 42.01% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 35.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 22.3 (Supported · #115/150)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.8% | 34% | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
| Vibe Code Bench | 0.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 54.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HumanEval | Coming soon | 92.1% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 73.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 25.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond | Coming soon | 66.5% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 74.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 45.6 (Supported · #96/184)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 27.2 (Supported · #165/184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 83% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 18.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU | Coming soon | 85.1% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 80% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 57.8 (#83/148)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 28.8 (#140/148)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 2.5 Pro public-lane score: 36.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2024 | 92% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 24.561% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 97% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 73.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 74.2% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 2.5 Pro and Sarvam 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Sarvam 30B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-sarvam-30b)
- [Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gemini-2-5-pro-vs-gpt-6-1-sol)
- [Sarvam 30B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-sarvam-30b)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro profile](/models/gemini-2-5-pro)
- [Sarvam 30B profile](/models/sarvam-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)