# Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 Argon

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 4 Argon across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-gemini-4-argon
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 4 Argon share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Gemini 4 Argon has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Google |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | null |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 64.51 | 64.59 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 29 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $12.00 | $2.00 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 38.5 (Supported · #59/119)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 63.7 (Estimated · #14/119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 57.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 69.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 95.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 56.87% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 13.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 51.3% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 65.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 57.40% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 39.5% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 69.2% | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | Coming soon | 68.0% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (6x verifier timeout) | Coming soon | 57.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 42.5 (Supported · #59/144)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 68.4 (Supported · #8/144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 82.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 78.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 32.03% | 91.90% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 88.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 78.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 22.0% | 45.3% | Gemini 4 Argon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 77.9% | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | Coming soon | 55.1% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 54.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 77.1 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Graphwalks BFS 128K | Coming soon | 99.7% | Coming soon |
| GraphWalks BFS 256K–1M | Coming soon | 84.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 80.1 (#13/49)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 80.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ERQA | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 84.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | 29.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | 81.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Chartography (no tools) | Coming soon | 71.6% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 66.6 (Supported · #21/170)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: 72.9 (Supported · #11/170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 94.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 45.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 20.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 71.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 95.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 91.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LABBench2 | Coming soon | 88.8% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | Coming soon | 0.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 54.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Gemini 4 Argon public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Gemini 4 Argon | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 36.900% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 16.700% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 4 Argon?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-3-1-pro)
- [Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-4-argon)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro profile](/models/gemini-3-1-pro)
- [Gemini 4 Argon profile](/models/gemini-4-argon)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)