# Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 23, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 64.72 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 31 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $12.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 38.4 (Supported · #74/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 57.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 69.7% | 90.8% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| τ²-bench results | 95.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 56.87% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 13.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MazeBench | 1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 57.1% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 39.2 (Supported · #69/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 82.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 78.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 32.03% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 88.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 78.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 22.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 58.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 80.3 (#18/56)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ParseBench | 69.14% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 80.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ERQA | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 84.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | 29.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | 81.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 67 (Supported · #26/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 94.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 45.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 20.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 71.5% | 51.0% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 95.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 91.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 65 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 59.649% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 26.829% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro profile](/models/gemini-3-1-pro)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)