# Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 10
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Gemini 3.1 Pro leads overall 69.82 to 60.72.
- The clearest category separation is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 79.2 for Gemini 3.1 Pro and 58.5 for MiMo-V2.5.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond (Vals) in Knowledge, with scores of 95.5% and 81.6%.
- MiMo-V2.5 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Xiaomi |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 69.82 | 60.72 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 28 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $12.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 40.1 (Supported · #120/151)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 51.1 (Estimated · #58/151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 57.8% | 62.3% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| DeepSearchQA | 69.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 95.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 56.87% | 46.89% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| ResearchClawBench | 13.3% | 16.9% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 70.8% | 60.7% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| MM-ClawBench | Coming soon | 23.8% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 46.2 (Supported · #99/183)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 54.8 (Estimated · #45/183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 82.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 78.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 32.03% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 88.5% | 81.5% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 78.8% | 71.0% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 56.1% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 79.2 (#12/48)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 58.5 (#29/48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 83.9% | 77.9% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| CharXiv | 80.2% | 81% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| ERQA | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 84.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | 29.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (MM) | 81.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 50.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 0.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 65.4 (Supported · #24/181)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 53.8 (Estimated · #65/181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 94.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 45.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 20.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 71.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 95.5% | 81.6% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 91.0% | 82.9% | Gemini 3.1 Pro |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Coming soon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro public-lane score: 54.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 36.900% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 16.700% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Gemini 3.1 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Gemini 3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.5?

The widest category gap is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 79.2 for Gemini 3.1 Pro and 58.5 for MiMo-V2.5.

### How many benchmarks does Gemini 3.1 Pro cover on BenchLM?

Gemini 3.1 Pro currently has 28 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does MiMo-V2.5 cover on BenchLM?

MiMo-V2.5 currently has 15 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemini-3-1-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-5)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 3.1 Pro profile](/models/gemini-3-1-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5 profile](/models/mimo-v2-5)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)