# Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 3.7 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-ling-3-1-flash
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 3.7 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 67.05 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 25 | 8 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.75 / $3.75 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 58.1 (Supported · #24/119)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 85.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 14.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 30.4% | 52.5% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 47.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 26.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 77.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 16% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 85.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 59.5 (Supported · #21/144)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierCode 1.1 Main | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 65.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 85.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 20.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 88.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| terminalBench4 | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 55.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 77.9 (Unranked · 5 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 64K-128K | 97% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 83.6 (#10/49)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv w/o tools | 84.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 88.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LVBench | 85.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 70.7 (Supported · #13/170)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE-Verified | 53.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LABBench2 | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-solvable) | 87.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) | 43.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 93.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 90.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 65.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 3.7 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ling-3-1-flash)
- [Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-3-7-flash)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ling-3-1-flash)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 3.7 Flash profile](/models/gemini-3-7-flash)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)