# Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Ling 3.1 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Ling 3.1 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-cyber-vs-ling-3-1-flash
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Ling 3.1 Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | null | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 8 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CyberGym | 86.2% | 87.9% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| CWE-Bench | 47.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 52.5% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 85.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| terminalBench4 | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 55.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 65.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | 6.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Gemini 3.8 Flash](/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-gemini-3-8-flash-cyber)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash](/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-vs-ling-3-1-flash)
- [Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-cyber-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ling-3-1-flash)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber profile](/models/gemini-3-8-flash-cyber)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)
