# Gemini 4 Carbon vs Ling 3.1 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemini 4 Carbon and Ling 3.1 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-ling-3-1-flash
- Last updated: October 28, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon and Ling 3.1 Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | null | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 88.42 | 65.47 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $10.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 63.4 (Estimated · #17/134)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | 53.9% | 52.5% | Gemini 4 Carbon |
| OSWorld 2.1 Offline | 81.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 53.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 85.5% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 81.2% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 47.8% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 83% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | Coming soon | 83.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: 82.2 (Supported · #3/156)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 58.5 (Estimated · #23/156)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierSWE v2 | 61.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| terminalBench4 | Coming soon | 46.0% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 64.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 59.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: 79.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 82 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GraphWalks BFS 256K–1M | 96.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Chartography (no tools) | 72.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 58.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: 88.2 (Supported · #2/178)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 65.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 37.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemini 4 Carbon public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Carbon | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | 0.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemini 4 Carbon and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon](/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-gemini-4-carbon)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon](/compare/gemini-4-argon-vs-ling-3-1-flash)
- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemini-4-carbon)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ling-3-1-flash)

## Explore More

- [Gemini 4 Carbon profile](/models/gemini-4-carbon)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)