# Gemma 2 27B vs Sarvam 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 2 27B and Sarvam 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-sarvam-30b
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemma 2 27B and Sarvam 30B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Sarvam 30B has the larger published context window at 64K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Sarvam |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 8K | 64K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 28.5 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 1 | 9 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 35.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HumanEval | Coming soon | 92.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 34% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 25.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond | Coming soon | 66.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 27.6 (Supported · #161/181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU | 76.2% | 85.1% | Sarvam 30B |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 80% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: 28.8 (#123/128)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 2 27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Sarvam 30B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Sarvam 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 97% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 73.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 74.2% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemma 2 27B and Sarvam 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 2 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-gemma-2-27b)
- [Sarvam 30B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-sarvam-30b)
- [Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gemma-2-27b-vs-gpt-6-1-sol)
- [Sarvam 30B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-sarvam-30b)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 2 27B profile](/models/gemma-2-27b)
- [Sarvam 30B profile](/models/sarvam-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)