# Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Pareto 26.9

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Pareto 26.9 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-pareto-26-9
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Pareto 26.9 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower published output-token price.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger published context window at 256K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Pareto 26.9 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Unbiased |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 256K | N/A |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 55 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 4 | 4 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 51.8 (Estimated · #45/154)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 51.00% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 41.2 (Supported · #112/154)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 74.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 44.2 (#41/48)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 73.8% | 78% | Pareto 26.9 |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 66.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 43.2 (Supported · #122/184)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-Pro | 82.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 17.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 8.7% | 49% | Pareto 26.9 |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 26B A4B public-lane score: 87.3 (#31/124)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Pareto 26.9?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-31b)
- [Pareto 26.9 vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-pareto-26-9)
- [Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemma 4 12B](/compare/gemma-4-12b-vs-gemma-4-26b-a4b)
- [Pareto 26.9 vs Gemma 4 12B](/compare/gemma-4-12b-vs-pareto-26-9)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 4 26B A4B profile](/models/gemma-4-26b-a4b)
- [Pareto 26.9 profile](/models/pareto-26-9)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)