# Gemma 4 31B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Xiaomi |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 256K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 58.69 | 65.41 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 27.6 (Supported · #140/151)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 40.8 (Supported · #118/151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 35.26% | 62.70% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 63.8% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 72.9% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 68.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 57.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 43.5 (Supported · #123/183)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 57.1 (Estimated · #36/183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-Rebench | 41.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 75.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 57.2% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 68.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 81.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 74.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 58.4 (#30/48)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 76.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 70.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 76.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 47.9 (Supported · #104/181)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 55.5 (Supported · #58/181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 26.5% | 48% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| HLE w/o tools | 19.5% | 34% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 84.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 31B public-lane score: 92.6 (#12/120)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 93.5 (#6/120)

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemma 4 31B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 4 31B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-31b)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Gemma 4 31B vs Gemma 4 12B](/compare/gemma-4-12b-vs-gemma-4-31b)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemma 4 12B](/compare/gemma-4-12b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 4 31B profile](/models/gemma-4-31b)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro profile](/models/mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)