# Gemma 4 E4B vs GLM-4.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-4-e4b-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: October 17, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.7 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.7 has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | Z.AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 31.02 | 48.85 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 5 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 31.6 (Estimated · #91/128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 41% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 52% | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | Coming soon | 15.5% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 39.95% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 12.4 (Estimated · #138/150)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 37.2 (Supported · #72/150)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 52.0% | 84.9% | GLM-4.7 |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 73.8% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | Coming soon | 58.7% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 41.0% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 69.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 32.4 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 74.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCRv2 | 25.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 22.2 (#52/54)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 52.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 26.1 (Estimated · #170/184)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 44.1 (Supported · #100/184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 58.6% | 85.7% | GLM-4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro | 69.4% | 84.3% | GLM-4.7 |
| HLE | Coming soon | 24.8% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 51.9 (#88/148)
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#54/148)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: Coming soon
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | GLM-4.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 97.1% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemma 4 E4B and GLM-4.7?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-glm-4-7)
- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-glm-4-7)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 4 E4B profile](/models/gemma-4-e4b)
- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)