# Gemma 4 E4B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-4-e4b-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 has the lower published output-token price.
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 40.18 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 2 | 4 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 43.8 (Estimated · #96/154)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 39.5 (Estimated · #121/154)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 35.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 43 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 38 (Estimated · #147/184)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 58.6% | 84% | Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 |
| MMLU-Pro | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 84.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 50.5 (#80/124)
- Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 public-lane score: 69.7 (#65/124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 73.4% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Flash FP8?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8)
- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 4 E4B profile](/models/gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash FP8 profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-fp8)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)