# Gemma 4 E4B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gemma-4-e4b-vs-ling-3-0-tiny
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny.

## Summary

- Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Tiny |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Google | InclusionAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 39.89 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 2 | 0 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 43.4 (Estimated · #95/152)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: Coming soon

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 39.2 (Estimated · #119/151)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 35.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 43 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: 62.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 37.7 (Estimated · #145/183)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 E4B | Ling 3.0 Tiny | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 58.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Gemma 4 E4B public-lane score: 52.1 (#79/123)
- Ling 3.0 Tiny public-lane score: Coming soon

## FAQ

### Can I compare Gemma 4 E4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemma 4 26B A4B](/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b-vs-ling-3-0-tiny)
- [Gemma 4 E4B vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemma 4 31B](/compare/gemma-4-31b-vs-ling-3-0-tiny)

## Explore More

- [Gemma 4 E4B profile](/models/gemma-4-e4b)
- [Ling 3.0 Tiny profile](/models/ling-3-0-tiny)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)