# GLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.4 nano

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.6 and GPT-5.4 nano across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-6-vs-gpt-5-4-nano
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.6 and GPT-5.4 nano share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GPT-5.4 nano has the larger published context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | OpenAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 400K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 53.94 | 62.19 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 18 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | $0.20 / $1.25 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 37.3 (Supported · #127/151)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 46.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 39% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 56.1% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 35.5% | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | Coming soon | 92.5% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 41.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 48.8 (Estimated · #84/183)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 37.4 (Supported · #150/183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 3.09% | 26.10% | GPT-5.4 nano |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 84.0% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 69.8% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 23.8 (#45/48)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 66.1% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 41.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 72.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #115/181)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 48.5 (Supported · #99/181)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 37.7% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 24.3% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 77.5% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 77.2% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 42.1 (#98/120)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 92.9 (#9/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 27.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 43.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | GPT-5.4 nano | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 3.819% | 25.860% | GPT-5.4 nano |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 2.128% | 6.250% | GPT-5.4 nano |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.6 and GPT-5.4 nano?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.4](/compare/glm-4-6-vs-gpt-5-4)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4](/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)
- [GLM-4.6 vs GPT-5.4 mini](/compare/glm-4-6-vs-gpt-5-4-mini)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4 mini](/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.6 profile](/models/glm-4-6)
- [GPT-5.4 nano profile](/models/gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)