# GLM-4.6 vs Llama 4 Scout

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.6 and Llama 4 Scout across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-6-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.6 and Llama 4 Scout share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Llama 4 Scout has the larger published context window at 10M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.6 | Llama 4 Scout |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 10M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 53.94 | 35.64 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 1 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 33.1 (Estimated · #134/151)

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 48.8 (Estimated · #84/183)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 32.9 (Estimated · #160/183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 3.09% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 38 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 41.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 42.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #115/181)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 34.1 (Estimated · #169/181)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 42.1 (#98/120)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 45.7 (#89/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.6 public-lane score: 27.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 25.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 3.819% | 0.000% | GLM-4.6 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 2.128% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.6 and Llama 4 Scout?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-glm-4-6)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-llama-4-scout)
- [GLM-4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-6-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-llama-4-scout)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.6 profile](/models/glm-4-6)
- [Llama 4 Scout profile](/models/llama-4-scout)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)