# GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5.2

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and GLM-5.2 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-glm-5-2
- Last updated: September 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and GLM-5.2 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.7 has the lower published output-token price.
- GLM-5.2 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Z.AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.78 | 68.19 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 25 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $1.40 / $4.40 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #84/153)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 58.5 (Supported · #29/153)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | 81% | GLM-5.2 |
| BrowseComp | 52% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Coming soon | 4.6% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 76.8% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 48.2% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 20.7% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 67.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.8 (Supported · #73/152)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 61 (Supported · #19/152)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 62.1% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.9% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 81.0% | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 63.7% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | Coming soon | 55.0% | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | Coming soon | 58.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 69.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 74.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CritPt | Coming soon | 20.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.6 (Supported · #96/183)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.7 (Supported · #35/183)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | 91.2% | GLM-5.2 |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | 54.7% | GLM-5.2 |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 91.2% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 40.5% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 85.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 86.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#50/123)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 89.8 (#22/123)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 26 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 80.7 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | GLM-5.2 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 2.439% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 99.2% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 94.4% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 92.5% | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and GLM-5.2?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [GLM-5.2 profile](/models/glm-5-2)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)