# GLM-4.7 vs K-EXAONE 2.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and K-EXAONE 2.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-k-exaone-2-0
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and K-EXAONE 2.0 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- K-EXAONE 2.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | LG AI Research |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.71 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 45.3 (Estimated · #82/152)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 43.8% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 77.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.7 (Supported · #71/151)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | 68.2% | GLM-4.7 |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 37.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 43.8% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 69.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.6 (Supported · #95/183)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | 83.5% | GLM-4.7 |
| HLE | 24.8% | 18.3% | GLM-4.7 |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | Coming soon | 86.6% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#50/123)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 92.4% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 72.6% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| PolyMath | Coming soon | 71.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 26 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 2.439% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 92.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 78.6% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and K-EXAONE 2.0?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-glm-4-7)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-k-exaone-2-0)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-k-exaone-2-0)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 profile](/models/k-exaone-2-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)