# GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and Kimi K3.1 Pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-kimi-3-1-pro
- Last updated: October 23, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and Kimi K3.1 Pro share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.7 has the lower published output-token price.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger published context window at 1.05M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Moonshot AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Pending |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 1.05M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 48.81 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 42 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $2.00 / $10.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 31.5 (Estimated · #95/132)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | 92.1% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 65.70% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | Coming soon | 38.1% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 70.0% | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench | Coming soon | 80.6% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 43.2% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam (CLI) | Coming soon | 44.2% | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | Coming soon | 67.2% | Coming soon |
| Frontier Finance | Coming soon | 58.6% | Coming soon |
| HANDBOOK.md | Coming soon | 44.6% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 79.6% | Coming soon |
| Business Operation | Coming soon | 37.8% | Coming soon |
| Financial Modeling | Coming soon | 57.6% | Coming soon |
| Financial Research | Coming soon | 70.4% | Coming soon |
| Kimi Hallu Bench Hard (tools) | Coming soon | 8.3% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 20.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 37.2 (Supported · #74/153)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 75.5% | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench (binary) | Coming soon | 31.5% | Coming soon |
| Kimi Code Bench v2 | Coming soon | 77.1% | Coming soon |
| Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizon | Coming soon | 61.2% | Coming soon |
| sweMarathon | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.2 | Coming soon | 36.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 73.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: 98 (#1/56)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | Coming soon | 67.4% | Coming soon |
| OfficeQA Pro v2 | Coming soon | 64.4% | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD Vision2Code (no tools) | Coming soon | 0.728 | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD Vision2Code (tools) | Coming soon | 0.927 | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 84.1% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | Coming soon | 90% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 93.4% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 89% | Coming soon |
| Chartography (tools) | Coming soon | 90.2% | Coming soon |
| BabyVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 95.4% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | Coming soon | 39.0% | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench w/ Python | Coming soon | 63.0% | Coming soon |
| GDP.pdf (Gemini judge) | Coming soon | 34.6% | Coming soon |
| GDP.pdf w/ Python (Gemini judge) | Coming soon | 85.7% | Coming soon |
| PerceptionBench | Coming soon | 68.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 43.4 (Supported · #103/187)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | 94.2% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | 70% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 80.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 94.2% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 51.1% | Coming soon |
| Kimi Hallu Bench | Coming soon | 5.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#56/153)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 97.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)
- [Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-kimi-3-1-pro)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-1-sol)
- [Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-kimi-3-1-pro)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Kimi K3.1 Pro profile](/models/kimi-3-1-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)