# GLM-4.7 vs LFM2.5-2.6B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-2.6B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-2.6B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.7 has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 57.76 | 39.9 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 45.1 (Estimated · #88/154)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37.2 (Estimated · #131/154)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 56.9% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 5.7% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 68.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.6 (Supported · #75/154)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 39.2 (Estimated · #125/154)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 59.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 69.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 24.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 47.5 (Supported · #97/184)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37 (Estimated · #151/184)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 81.4 (#51/124)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 38.1 (#104/124)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 59.2% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 25.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | 51.9% | GLM-4.7 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 2.439% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-2.6B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-glm-4-7)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B profile](/models/lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)