# GLM-4.7 vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- GLM-4.7 has the lower published output-token price.
- GLM-4.7 has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 48.42 | 37.8 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.10 / $1.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 31.8 (Estimated · #84/124)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 27.7% | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 65.0% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 8.0% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 83.2% | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | Coming soon | 26.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 37.7 (Supported · #70/149)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | 51% | GLM-4.7 |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 32.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 74.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 44.5 (Supported · #98/181)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | 74.4% | GLM-4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | 7.4% | GLM-4.7 |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 80.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 74.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#51/128)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 96.8% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 74.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 97.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 96.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-1-sol)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)