# GLM-4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 48.83 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 31.9 (Estimated · #95/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | 80.2% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 90.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 57.1% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 37.2 (Supported · #74/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 73.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 44.1 (Supported · #103/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 80.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 82.8 (#56/152)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 97.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)