# GLM-4.7 vs Llama 4 Scout

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and Llama 4 Scout across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: September 29, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-4.7 and Llama 4 Scout share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Llama 4 Scout has the larger published context window at 10M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 10M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.09 | 29.39 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 1 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 27.5 (Estimated · #88/117)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 9.9 (Estimated · #115/117)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 52% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 39.4 (Supported · #63/143)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 13.9 (Estimated · #139/143)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 71.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 41.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 39.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 40.5 (Supported · #98/169)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 26.5 (Estimated · #157/169)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 24.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 80.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 81.4 (#51/124)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 44.3 (#91/124)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 25.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Llama 4 Scout public-lane score: 25.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 2.439% | 0.000% | GLM-4.7 |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-4.7 and Llama 4 Scout?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-llama-4-scout)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)
- [Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-llama-4-scout)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Llama 4 Scout profile](/models/llama-4-scout)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)