# GLM-4.7 vs Qwen3.5-27B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-4.7 and Qwen3.5-27B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-4-7-vs-qwen3-5-27b
- Last updated: September 28, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 7
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-27B only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- GLM-4.7 leads overall 49.19 to 43.76.
- The clearest category separation is in reasoning, where the averages are 71.1 for GLM-4.7 and 52.7 for Qwen3.5-27B.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is BrowseComp in Agentic, with scores of 52% and 61%.
- Qwen3.5-27B also has the larger context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Overall Score | 49.19 | 43.76 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 17 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Directional only
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 27.4 (Estimated · #88/117)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 32.5 (Estimated · #74/117)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41% | 41.6% | Qwen3.5-27B |
| BrowseComp | 52% | 61% | Qwen3.5-27B |
| VITA-Bench | 15.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.95% | 39.41% | GLM-4.7 |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 56.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Directional only
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 39.4 (Supported · #62/142)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 32.4 (Estimated · #86/142)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.8% | 72.4% | GLM-4.7 |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.7% | 58.9% | Qwen3.5-27B |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 71.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 52.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | Coming soon | 60.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 71.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | Coming soon | 82.3% | Coming soon |
| MMVU | Coming soon | 73.3% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 86.0% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 93.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Qwen3.5-27B
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 40.7 (Supported · #97/168)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 42.3 (Supported · #87/168)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.7% | 85.5% | GLM-4.7 |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.3% | 86.1% | Qwen3.5-27B |
| HLE | 24.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 80.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | Coming soon | 65.6% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 36.8 (#9/12)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-ProX | Coming soon | 82.2% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Directional only
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 81.4 (#51/124)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 91.5 (#13/124)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 95% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-4.7 public-lane score: 25.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-4.7 | Qwen3.5-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 95.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 2.439% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 0.000% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, GLM-4.7 or Qwen3.5-27B?

GLM-4.7 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between GLM-4.7 and Qwen3.5-27B?

The widest category gap is in reasoning, where the averages are 71.1 for GLM-4.7 and 52.7 for Qwen3.5-27B.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-4.7 cover on BenchLM?

GLM-4.7 currently has 17 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Qwen3.5-27B cover on BenchLM?

Qwen3.5-27B currently has 16 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/glm-4-7-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Qwen3.5-27B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-qwen3-5-27b)
- [GLM-4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-glm-4-7)
- [Qwen3.5-27B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-5-27b)

## Explore More

- [GLM-4.7 profile](/models/glm-4-7)
- [Qwen3.5-27B profile](/models/qwen3-5-27b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)