# GLM-5.2 vs Laguna S 2.1

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5.2 and Laguna S 2.1 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-2-vs-laguna-s-2-1
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-5.2 and Laguna S 2.1 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Laguna S 2.1 has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Poolside |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 68.22 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 25 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $0.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.2 (Supported · #25/151)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: 48.2 (Estimated · #77/151)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 4.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 81% | 70.2% | GLM-5.2 |
| MCP Atlas | 76.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | 48.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 49.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.9 (Supported · #20/183)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: 47.8 (Estimated · #87/183)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 62.1% | 59.4% | GLM-5.2 |
| NL2Repo | 48.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 81.0% | 70.2% | GLM-5.2 |
| ProgramBench | 63.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench32 | 55.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 58.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 69.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 78.5% | Coming soon |
| deepSwe | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 76.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CritPt | 20.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 60.9 (Supported · #39/181)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 91.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 91.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 40.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 85.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 86.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 89.6 (#22/120)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 80.7 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 99.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 94.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 92.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | 91.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-5.2 and Laguna S 2.1?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3)
- [Laguna S 2.1 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-laguna-s-2-1)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [Laguna S 2.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-laguna-s-2-1)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5.2 profile](/models/glm-5-2)
- [Laguna S 2.1 profile](/models/laguna-s-2-1)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)