# GLM-5.2 vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5.2 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-2-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-5.2 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B has the lower published output-token price.
- GLM-5.2 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 60.1 | 37.8 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 29 | 13 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $1.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 56.5 (Supported · #33/124)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 4.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 76.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | 48.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 27.7% | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 65.0% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 8.0% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 83.2% | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | Coming soon | 26.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 53.9 (Supported · #33/149)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 62.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | 48.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | 63.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 3.2 | 55.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 58.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 69.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 31.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 32.7% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 51% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 79.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CritPt | 20.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 57.8 (Supported · #52/181)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 91.2% | 74.4% | GLM-5.2 |
| GPQA-D | 91.2% | 74.4% | GLM-5.2 |
| HLE | 40.5% | 7.4% | GLM-5.2 |
| HLE w/o tools | 40.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 85.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 86.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 89.9 (#26/128)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 96.8% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 74.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 78.4 (#3/12)
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 99.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 94.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 92.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | 91.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 59.206% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 29.268% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 96.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-5.2 and LFM2.5-24B-A2B?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5.2 profile](/models/glm-5-2)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)