# GLM-5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-2-vs-muse-spark-1-1
- Last updated: October 7, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 12
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GLM-5.2 only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Muse Spark 1.1 leads overall 65.95 to 61.56.
- The clearest category separation is in knowledge, where the averages are 56.9 for GLM-5.2 and 66.7 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Toolathlon in Agentic, with scores of 48.2% and 75.6%.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Overall Score | 61.56 | 65.95 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 26 | 26 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.40 / $4.40 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Muse Spark 1.1
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 56.4 (Supported · #33/122)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: 56.9 (Supported · #32/122)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 4.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81.0% | 80.0% | GLM-5.2 |
| MCP Atlas | 76.8% | 88.1% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| Toolathlon | 48.2% | 75.6% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| ResearchClawBench | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.8% | 69.3% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | Coming soon | 69% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 84.9% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 59.0% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.2% | Coming soon |
| deepSwe | Coming soon | 53.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 14.2% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 54.7% | Coming soon |
| Cybench | Coming soon | 92.9% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 0.8% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: GLM-5.2
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 55.3 (Supported · #31/146)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: 54.2 (Supported · #35/146)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 62.1% | 61.5% | GLM-5.2 |
| NL2Repo | 48.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81.0% | 80.0% | GLM-5.2 |
| ProgramBench | 63.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 3.2 | 55.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 58.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 69.5% | 85.9% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.8% | 82.0% | GLM-5.2 |
| PostTrainBench v1.1 | 31.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 76.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: 75.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CritPt | 20.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MRCR 1M | Coming soon | 54.1% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: 78.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 88.4% | Coming soon |
| BabyVision | Coming soon | 76.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Muse Spark 1.1
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 56.9 (Supported · #49/174)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: 66.7 (Supported · #21/174)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 91.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 91.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 54.7% | 62.1% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| HLE w/o tools | 40.5% | 52.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 85.6% | 91.2% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 86.7% | 88.7% | Muse Spark 1.1 |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 59.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 88.5 (#22/125)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.2 public-lane score: 80.7 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- Muse Spark 1.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Muse Spark 1.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 99.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 94.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 92.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | 91.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, GLM-5.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between GLM-5.2 and Muse Spark 1.1?

The widest category gap is in knowledge, where the averages are 56.9 for GLM-5.2 and 66.7 for Muse Spark 1.1.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-5.2 cover on BenchLM?

GLM-5.2 currently has 26 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Muse Spark 1.1 cover on BenchLM?

Muse Spark 1.1 currently has 26 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3)
- [Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-muse-spark-1-1)
- [GLM-5.2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash](/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-muse-spark-1-1)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5.2 profile](/models/glm-5-2)
- [Muse Spark 1.1 profile](/models/muse-spark-1-1)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)