# GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.6

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5.3-Flash and Grok 4.6 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-3-flash-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: October 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 8
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Grok 4.6 leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Grok 4.6 has the higher overall point estimate 67.92 to 57.36. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in reasoning, where the averages are 81.1 for GLM-5.3-Flash and 61.5 for Grok 4.6.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) in Agentic, with scores of 62.9% and 78.3%.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- GLM-5.3-Flash also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | xAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 500K |
| Overall Score | 57.36 | 67.92 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 20 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Grok 4.6
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 55.7 (Supported · #34/123)
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 68.4 (Supported · #9/123)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | 78.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 48.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 26.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 55.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 62.9% | 78.3% | Grok 4.6 |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | Coming soon | 26.5% | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | Coming soon | 57.5% | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | Coming soon | 13% | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | Coming soon | 57.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Grok 4.6
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 49.3 (Supported · #42/146)
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 59.8 (Supported · #21/146)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 84.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 63.4% | 65.9% | Grok 4.6 |
| NL2Repo | 56.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 80.5% | 88.2% | Grok 4.6 |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 92.0% | 95.6% | Grok 4.6 |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 57.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 18.1% | 25.3% | Grok 4.6 |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 17.7 fixes | 27.0 fixes | Grok 4.6 |
| CursorBench 3.2 | Coming soon | 70.8% | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Extended | Coming soon | 61.3% | Coming soon |
| VulcanBench v3 | Coming soon | 87.0% | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 4.0 | Coming soon | 41.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Directional only
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 81.1 (#11/28)
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 61.5 (#25/28)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | Coming soon | 87.00% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Coming soon | 67.1% | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | Coming soon | 2.1% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 84 (#14/54)
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 62.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 89.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Chartography (tools) | 78.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BabyVision | 53.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMVU | 80.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Grok 4.6
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: 60.5 (Supported · #43/177)
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 69.8 (Supported · #16/177)

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 86.4% | 94.7% | Grok 4.6 |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 86.1% | 89.4% | Grok 4.6 |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- GLM-5.3-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.6 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | Coming soon | 51.8% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, GLM-5.3-Flash or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between GLM-5.3-Flash and Grok 4.6?

The widest category gap is in reasoning, where the averages are 81.1 for GLM-5.3-Flash and 61.5 for Grok 4.6.

### How many benchmarks does GLM-5.3-Flash cover on BenchLM?

GLM-5.3-Flash currently has 21 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Grok 4.6 cover on BenchLM?

Grok 4.6 currently has 20 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-grok-4-6)
- [GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-3-flash)
- [Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-grok-4-6)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5.3-Flash profile](/models/glm-5-3-flash)
- [Grok 4.6 profile](/models/grok-4-6)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)