# GLM-5-Turbo vs LFM2.5-2.6B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5-Turbo and LFM2.5-2.6B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-turbo-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-5-Turbo and LFM2.5-2.6B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM2.5-2.6B has the lower published output-token price.
- GLM-5-Turbo has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5-Turbo | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 61.42 | 39.9 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 1 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.20 / $4.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37.2 (Estimated · #131/154)

| Benchmark | GLM-5-Turbo | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 55.8% | 62.9% | LFM2.5-2.6B |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 56.9% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 5.7% | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | Coming soon | 68.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 39.2 (Estimated · #125/154)

| Benchmark | GLM-5-Turbo | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 59.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: 70.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 24.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: 53.8 (Estimated · #62/184)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37 (Estimated · #151/184)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: 88.3 (#25/124)
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 38.1 (#104/124)

| Benchmark | GLM-5-Turbo | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 59.2% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5-Turbo public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5-Turbo | LFM2.5-2.6B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 51.9% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-5-Turbo and LFM2.5-2.6B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5-Turbo vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-glm-5-turbo)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [GLM-5-Turbo vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-glm-5-turbo)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5-Turbo profile](/models/glm-5-turbo)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B profile](/models/lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)