# GLM-5 vs Laguna S 2.1

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GLM-5 and Laguna S 2.1 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/glm-5-vs-laguna-s-2-1
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GLM-5 and Laguna S 2.1 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Laguna S 2.1 has the lower published output-token price.
- Laguna S 2.1 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Z.AI | Poolside |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 62.16 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 36 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.00 / $3.20 | $0.10 / $0.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 50 (Estimated · #65/151)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: 48.2 (Estimated · #77/151)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 56.2% | 70.2% | Laguna S 2.1 |
| Claw-Eval | 57.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| QwenClawBench | 54.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 65.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepPlanning | 14.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | 38% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 31.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP-Tasks | 60.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | 69.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 43.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 50.99% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 49.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 49.1 (Supported · #80/183)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: 47.8 (Estimated · #87/183)

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | 72.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 55.1% | 59.4% | Laguna S 2.1 |
| SWE Multilingual | 73.3% | 78.5% | Laguna S 2.1 |
| SWE-Rebench | 62.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 74.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 70.2% | Coming soon |
| deepSwe | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 51.6 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 60.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AI-Needle | 63.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 54.9 (Estimated · #62/181)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 86% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 86.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | 66.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | 85.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 50.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 88.3 (#31/120)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 92.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 48.7 (#6/12)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-ProX | 83.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| NOVA-63 | 55.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GLM-5 public-lane score: 56.9 (#7/7)
- Laguna S 2.1 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GLM-5 | Laguna S 2.1 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 95.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME25 (Arcee) | 93.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 97.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 96.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 86.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | 82.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 16.434% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 2.100% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GLM-5 and Laguna S 2.1?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GLM-5 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-vs-glm-5-3)
- [Laguna S 2.1 vs GLM-5.3](/compare/glm-5-3-vs-laguna-s-2-1)
- [GLM-5 vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-vs-glm-5-2)
- [Laguna S 2.1 vs GLM-5.2](/compare/glm-5-2-vs-laguna-s-2-1)

## Explore More

- [GLM-5 profile](/models/glm-5)
- [Laguna S 2.1 profile](/models/laguna-s-2-1)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)