# GPT-5.1-Codex vs MiniMax M2.7

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax M2.7 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax M2.7 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiniMax M2.7 has the lower published output-token price.
- GPT-5.1-Codex has the larger published context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-5.1-Codex | MiniMax M2.7 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 400K | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 51.62 | 58.98 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 23 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.25 / $10.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 51.4 (Estimated · #54/151)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 43.1 (Estimated · #107/151)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gert Labs | 49.68% | 40.40% | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| JobBench | 26.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 57% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 46.3% | Coming soon |
| MLE-Bench Lite | Coming soon | 66.6% | Coming soon |
| MM-ClawBench | Coming soon | 62.7% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 48.7% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 48.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 47.4 (Estimated · #89/183)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 50.5 (Estimated · #70/183)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 13.12% | 27.04% | MiniMax M2.7 |
| SWE-bench Verified* | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 56.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | Coming soon | 51.9% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 76.5% | Coming soon |
| Multi-SWE Bench | Coming soon | 52.7% | Coming soon |
| VIBE-Pro | Coming soon | 55.6% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 39.8% | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | Coming soon | 71.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 79.9% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 73.8% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 66.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 70.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 75.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 53.3 (Estimated · #69/181)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 50.2 (Supported · #88/181)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 87.0% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 86.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 80.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: 85.3 (#42/120)
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 92.7 (#10/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.1-Codex public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | MiniMax M2.7 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | Coming soon | 80.0% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GPT-5.1-Codex and MiniMax M2.7?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-5.1-Codex vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gpt-5-1-codex)
- [MiniMax M2.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-minimax-m2-7)
- [GPT-5.1-Codex vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-5-1-codex-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-minimax-m2-7)

## Explore More

- [GPT-5.1-Codex profile](/models/gpt-5-1-codex)
- [MiniMax M2.7 profile](/models/minimax-m2-7)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)