# GPT-5.2 vs LFM3-VL-2B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-5.2 and LFM3-VL-2B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-5-2-vs-lfm3-vl-2b
- Last updated: October 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 14
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM3-VL-2B only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- GPT-5.2 leads overall 60.09 to 39.
- The clearest category separation is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 75.5 for GPT-5.2 and 19.6 for LFM3-VL-2B.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is VideoMMMU in Multimodal & Grounded, with scores of 85.9% and 49.6%.
- LFM3-VL-2B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- GPT-5.2 also has the larger context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 400K | 128K |
| Overall Score | 60.09 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 31 | 20 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.75 / $14.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 45.1 (Supported · #62/134)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 65.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 47.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 46.54% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 34.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 37.3 (Supported · #77/155)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 80% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 55.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 53.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 64.3 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.17% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 75.5 (#25/58)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: 19.6 (Unranked · 19 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | 86.7% | 55.7% | GPT-5.2 |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.5% | 45.7% | GPT-5.2 |
| RealWorldQA | 83.3% | 79.3% | GPT-5.2 |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | 86.0% | 69.0% | GPT-5.2 |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle) | 85.8% | 62.8% | GPT-5.2 |
| MathVision | 83.0% | 51.6% | GPT-5.2 |
| We-Math | 79.0% | 68.6% | GPT-5.2 |
| DynaMath | 86.8% | 79.2% | GPT-5.2 |
| SimpleVQA | 55.8% | 36.3% | GPT-5.2 |
| CC-OCR | 70.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AI2D_TEST | 92.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CountBench | 91.9% | 93.0% | LFM3-VL-2B |
| ERQA | 59.8% | 48.2% | GPT-5.2 |
| VideoMMMU | 85.9% | 49.6% | GPT-5.2 |
| MLVU (M-Avg) | 85.6% | 71.3% | GPT-5.2 |
| CharXiv | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| V* | 75.9% | 86.4% | LFM3-VL-2B |
| OCRBench V2 | Coming soon | 63.5% | Coming soon |
| RefCOCO (avg) | Coming soon | 90.5% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 70.2% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 55.5% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 41.2% | Coming soon |
| MMVU | Coming soon | 52.9% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 59.7 (Supported · #52/189)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 92.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 92.6 (#20/156)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- GPT-5.2 public-lane score: 71.1 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 100% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 67.400% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 31.700% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, GPT-5.2 or LFM3-VL-2B?

GPT-5.2 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between GPT-5.2 and LFM3-VL-2B?

The widest category gap is in multimodal & grounded, where the averages are 75.5 for GPT-5.2 and 19.6 for LFM3-VL-2B.

### How many benchmarks does GPT-5.2 cover on BenchLM?

GPT-5.2 currently has 31 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does LFM3-VL-2B cover on BenchLM?

LFM3-VL-2B currently has 20 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.2 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-2-vs-gpt-5-2-pro)
- [LFM3-VL-2B vs GPT-5.2 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-2-pro-vs-lfm3-vl-2b)
- [GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.2 Instant](/compare/gpt-5-2-vs-gpt-5-2-instant)
- [LFM3-VL-2B vs GPT-5.2 Instant](/compare/gpt-5-2-instant-vs-lfm3-vl-2b)

## Explore More

- [GPT-5.2 profile](/models/gpt-5-2)
- [LFM3-VL-2B profile](/models/lfm3-vl-2b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)