# GPT-5.4 nano vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-5.4 nano and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GPT-5.4 nano and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- GPT-5.4 nano has the larger published context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 400K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 46.82 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 23 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 33 (Supported · #90/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 39% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 56.1% | 75.6% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| Toolathlon | 35.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 92.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 41.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 90.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 57.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 29.5 (Supported · #100/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 26.10% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 84.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 40.6 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 51.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 52.1 (#49/55)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ExtractBench (LlamaIndex) | 74.90% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ParseBench | 43.35% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 66.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | 69.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 39.9 (Supported · #122/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 37.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 24.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 77.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 77.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 93.3 (#12/152)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 52.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 44.912% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 12.195% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GPT-5.4 nano and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-gpt-5-4-pro)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs GPT-5.4 Pro](/compare/gpt-5-4-pro-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4](/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs GPT-5.4](/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [GPT-5.4 nano profile](/models/gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)