# GPT-5.4 nano vs Ling 3.0 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-5.4 nano and Ling 3.0 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-ling-3-0-flash
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 8
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.4 nano if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 3.0 Flash only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- GPT-5.4 nano leads overall 62.19 to 52.2.
- The clearest category separation is in mathematics, where the averages are 43.9 for GPT-5.4 nano and 73.7 for Ling 3.0 Flash.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is HLE in Knowledge, with scores of 37.7% and 22.7%.
- Ling 3.0 Flash is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- GPT-5.4 nano also has the larger context window at 400K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 400K | 262K |
| Overall Score | 62.19 | 52.2 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 18 | 22 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.20 / $1.25 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Ling 3.0 Flash
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 37.3 (Supported · #127/151)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 40 (Supported · #121/151)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 39% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 56.1% | 65.5% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| Toolathlon | 35.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 92.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 41.6% | 50.2% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.8% | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | Coming soon | 73.0% | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | Coming soon | 73.6% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 72.2% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 70.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 37.4 (Supported · #150/183)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 42.8 (Estimated · #126/183)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vibe Code Bench | 26.10% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 84.0% | 84.0% | Tie |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 69.8% | 65.2% | GPT-5.4 nano |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 56.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 72.4% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v5 | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 41.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 23.8 (#45/48)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 66.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | 69.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 72.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 69.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: GPT-5.4 nano
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 48.5 (Supported · #99/181)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 45.9 (Supported · #112/181)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 82.8% | 85.0% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| HLE | 37.7% | 22.7% | GPT-5.4 nano |
| HLE w/o tools | 24.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 77.5% | 84.8% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 77.2% | 82.0% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 85.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 92.9 (#9/120)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 75.6 (#58/120)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 74.5% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Coming soon
- GPT-5.4 nano public-lane score: 43.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Ling 3.0 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 25.860% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 6.250% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 93.2% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 87.0% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 83.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, GPT-5.4 nano or Ling 3.0 Flash?

GPT-5.4 nano is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between GPT-5.4 nano and Ling 3.0 Flash?

The widest category gap is in mathematics, where the averages are 43.9 for GPT-5.4 nano and 73.7 for Ling 3.0 Flash.

### How many benchmarks does GPT-5.4 nano cover on BenchLM?

GPT-5.4 nano currently has 18 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Ling 3.0 Flash cover on BenchLM?

Ling 3.0 Flash currently has 22 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4](/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.4](/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.4 mini](/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini](/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-ling-3-0-flash)

## Explore More

- [GPT-5.4 nano profile](/models/gpt-5-4-nano)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)