# GPT-6.1 Terra vs Ling 3.1 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-6.1 Terra and Ling 3.1 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-ling-3-1-flash
- Last updated: October 26, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GPT-6.1 Terra and Ling 3.1 Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger published context window at 1.05M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 75.87 | 68.01 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 10 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.00 / $5.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6.1 Terra public-lane score: 72.4 (Estimated · #8/133)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 62.5 (Estimated · #22/133)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 50.30% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 58.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 60.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.1 Offline | 74.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 52.5% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 85.5% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 81.2% | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 47.8% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 83% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | Coming soon | 83.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6.1 Terra public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 57.2 (Estimated · #27/154)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| terminalBench4 | Coming soon | 46.0% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 64.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 59.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6.1 Terra public-lane score: 81.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 82 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6.1 Terra public-lane score: 91.6 (#4/58)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 85.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6.1 Terra public-lane score: 74.9 (Supported · #12/188)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: 62.7 (Supported · #44/188)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Terra | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench (raw) | 51.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench (length-adjusted) | 55.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | 62.7% | 65.3% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| HealthBench Professional (raw) | 64.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 31.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 37.4% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GPT-6.1 Terra and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-gpt-6-astra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ling-3-1-flash)
- [GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-gpt-6-1-terra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-ling-3-1-flash)

## Explore More

- [GPT-6.1 Terra profile](/models/gpt-6-1-terra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)