# GPT-6 Sol vs Ling 3.1 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/gpt-6-sol-vs-ling-3-1-flash
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- GPT-6 Sol has the larger published context window at 1.05M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | GPT-6 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 78.31 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 12 | 8 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $10.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 60 (Supported · #19/119)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Agents' Last Exam | 56.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 33.2% | 52.5% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 60.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 22.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | 52.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 68.7% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 87.9% | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | Coming soon | 57.9% | Coming soon |
| DRACO | Coming soon | 85.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 63 (Supported · #13/144)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| terminalBench4 | Coming soon | 40.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 55.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 79.6 (#4/27)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 83.8 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: 78.8 (Supported · #7/170)
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench (raw) | 47.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench (length-adjusted) | 53.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Professional | 60.8% | 65.3% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| HealthBench Professional (raw) | 59.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HealthBench Hard | 30.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- GPT-6 Sol public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Ling 3.1 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | 10.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between GPT-6 Sol and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-gpt-6-sol)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ling-3-1-flash)
- [GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-gpt-6-sol)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-ling-3-1-flash)

## Explore More

- [GPT-6 Sol profile](/models/gpt-6-sol)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)