# Granite 4.2 8B vs OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Granite 4.2 8B and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/granite-4-2-8b-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Granite 4.2 8B and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | IBM | OrcaRouter |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 32.74 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 14 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: 15.9 (Estimated · #117/132)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 20.6% | 72.5% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| τ³-bench results | 58.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 52.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: 17.2 (Estimated · #128/153)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 47.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 19.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | 30.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 20.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 73.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | 36.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: 55.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: 30.4 (Supported · #157/187)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 64.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 74.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 88.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: 86.5 (#44/152)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 79.3% | 56.3% | Granite 4.2 8B |
| IFEval | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Granite 4.2 8B public-lane score: Coming soon
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 86.7% | 96.2% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 78.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98.6% | Coming soon |
| GSM8K | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Granite 4.2 8B and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Granite 4.2 8B vs Granite 4.2 30B](/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-granite-4-2-8b)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Granite 4.2 30B](/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Granite 4.2 8B vs Granite 4.2 3B](/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-granite-4-2-8b)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Granite 4.2 3B](/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)

## Explore More

- [Granite 4.2 8B profile](/models/granite-4-2-8b)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)