# Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/grok-4-6-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Grok 4.6 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 500K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 69.9 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 12 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 69.7 (Supported · #7/154)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 26.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 57.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 78.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | 13% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 73.6% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 52.3% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 27.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 28.80% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 61.2% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 95.1% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 6.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 66.8 (Supported · #12/156)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Bug Hunt Bench | 27 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 65.9% | 67.9% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| cursorBench32 | 70.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 1.1 Extended | 61.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VulcanBench v3 | 87.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 25.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 88.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 95.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| cursorBench40 | 41.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 26.0% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 76.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.6 public-lane score: 70.5 (Supported · #12/186)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 94.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 89.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/grok-4-6-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [Grok 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-grok-4-6)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash)

## Explore More

- [Grok 4.6 profile](/models/grok-4-6)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile](/models/mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)