# Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/grok-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- Grok 4.7 has the larger published context window at 500K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | xAI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 500K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 18 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 73.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | 68.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Index | 39.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Bench | 74.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MazeBench | 1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 90.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 57.1% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CursorBench 4.0 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| EEBench | 64.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 29.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 29.0 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 58.9 (#25/27)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 1.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter | 7.02% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 56.7% | 54.3% | Grok 4.7 |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 58.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 52.982% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 17.073% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/grok-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/grok-4-7-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [Grok 4.7 profile](/models/grok-4-7)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)