# Grok 4.7 vs Mercury 2.5

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mercury-2-5
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Mercury 2.5 has the lower published output-token price.
- Grok 4.7 has the larger published context window at 500K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Grok 4.7 | Mercury 2.5 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | xAI | Inception |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 500K | 260K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.04 / $0.15 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mercury 2.5 public-lane score: 37.4 (Estimated · #131/154)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mercury 2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38.00% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 76.0% | 34.1% | Grok 4.7 |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 96.0% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 34.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mercury 2.5 public-lane score: 41.6 (Estimated · #113/156)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mercury 2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| cursorBench40 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| EEBench | 64.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 38% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Mercury 2.5 public-lane score: 67.7 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mercury 2.5 public-lane score: 47.9 (Estimated · #97/186)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mercury 2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 56.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 79.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mercury 2.5 public-lane score: 77.7 (#56/124)

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Mercury 2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2.5?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Grok 4.7 vs Mercury 2.5 Preview](/compare/grok-4-7-vs-mercury-2-5-preview)
- [Mercury 2.5 vs Mercury 2.5 Preview](/compare/mercury-2-5-vs-mercury-2-5-preview)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-grok-4-7)
- [Mercury 2.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mercury-2-5)

## Explore More

- [Grok 4.7 profile](/models/grok-4-7)
- [Mercury 2.5 profile](/models/mercury-2-5)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)