# Grok 4.7 vs Muse Ember

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Grok 4.7 and Muse Ember across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/grok-4-7-vs-muse-ember
- Last updated: November 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Grok 4.7 and Muse Ember share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Ember has the lower published output-token price.
- Muse Ember has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | xAI | Meta |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 500K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 56.24 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 21 | 4 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.1 | 38.80% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38.00% | 40.90% | Muse Ember |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 73.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | 68.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Index | 39.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Hermes Bench | 74.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MazeBench | 1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench | 54.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.1 | Coming soon | 69.5% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam (Linux) | Coming soon | 61.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CursorBench 4.0 | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| EEBench | 64.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 29.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 29.0 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 28.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 89.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 | 1.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter | 7.02% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| PerceptionBench (tools) | Coming soon | 80.6% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 56.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Grok 4.7 public-lane score: 55.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Ember public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Ember | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 52.982% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 17.073% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Grok 4.7 and Muse Ember?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Grok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.2](/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-grok-4-7)
- [Muse Ember vs Claude Fable 5.2](/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-muse-ember)
- [Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-grok-4-7)
- [Muse Ember vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-ember)

## Explore More

- [Grok 4.7 profile](/models/grok-4-7)
- [Muse Ember profile](/models/muse-ember)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)