# Inkling vs OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Inkling and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/inkling-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Inkling and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the lower published output-token price.
- Inkling has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Thinking Machines Lab | OrcaRouter |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Hybrid | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 52.58 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 24 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $1.87 / $4.68 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 37.1 (Supported · #77/132)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 63.8% | 72.5% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| BrowseComp | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 74.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 47.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | 37.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 33.6 (Supported · #85/153)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 54.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 63.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierSWE v2 | 4.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 85.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 77.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 78.1 (#12/27)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 67.8 (#35/55)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU-Pro | 73.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 82% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 78.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 54.4 (Supported · #65/187)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 87.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 87.9% | 88.3% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| HLE | 46% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 30% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 87.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 86.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 87.6 (#38/152)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 79.8% | 56.3% | Inkling |
| IFEval | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Inkling public-lane score: 58.3 (#11/12)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Inkling | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 97.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 33.333% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 4.878% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98.6% | Coming soon |
| GSM8K | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Inkling and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Inkling vs Inkling-Small](/compare/inkling-vs-inkling-small)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Inkling-Small](/compare/inkling-small-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Inkling vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-inkling)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)

## Explore More

- [Inkling profile](/models/inkling)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)