# OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) vs Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) and Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/jevbench-openjev-razorback16-vs-jevbench-raw-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) and Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) | Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | razorback16 / Codiv | Microsoft / neutral reproduction |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | null | null |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 1 | 2 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) public-lane score: Coming soon
- Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) | Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| JevBench 1.4 | 36.85 | 37.96 | Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits |
| JevBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 15.22 | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) and Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-jevbench-openjev-razorback16)
- [Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-jevbench-raw-phi-4-mini)
- [OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-jevbench-openjev-razorback16)
- [Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-jevbench-raw-phi-4-mini)

## Explore More

- [OpenJev (DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B NVFP4, razorback16) profile](/models/jevbench-openjev-razorback16)
- [Raw Phi-4 mini direct logits profile](/models/jevbench-raw-phi-4-mini)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)