# K-EXAONE 2.0 vs Phi-4-reasoning

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for K-EXAONE 2.0 and Phi-4-reasoning across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/k-exaone-2-0-vs-phi-4-reasoning
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: K-EXAONE 2.0 and Phi-4-reasoning share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- K-EXAONE 2.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LG AI Research | Microsoft |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 32K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 77.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 37.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 68.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 43.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | Coming soon | 53.8% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | 74.3% | K-EXAONE 2.0 |
| GPQA-D | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 18.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | 86.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| PolyMath | 71.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 92.4% | 83.4% | K-EXAONE 2.0 |
| IFBench | 72.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- K-EXAONE 2.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | K-EXAONE 2.0 | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 92.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 78.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | 78.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2024 | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between K-EXAONE 2.0 and Phi-4-reasoning?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus](/compare/k-exaone-2-0-vs-phi-4-reasoning-plus)
- [Phi-4-reasoning vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus](/compare/phi-4-reasoning-vs-phi-4-reasoning-plus)
- [K-EXAONE 2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-k-exaone-2-0)
- [Phi-4-reasoning vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-phi-4-reasoning)

## Explore More

- [K-EXAONE 2.0 profile](/models/k-exaone-2-0)
- [Phi-4-reasoning profile](/models/phi-4-reasoning)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)