# Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-VL-2B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Kimi K3.1 Pro and LFM3-VL-2B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/kimi-3-1-pro-vs-lfm3-vl-2b
- Last updated: October 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro and LFM3-VL-2B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM3-VL-2B has the lower published output-token price.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger published context window at 1.05M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Kimi K3.1 Pro | LFM3-VL-2B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Moonshot AI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Pending | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 45 | 20 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $2.00 / $10.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K3.1 Pro | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 65.70% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 38.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 70.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 92.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BioMysteryBench | 80.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 43.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam (CLI) | 44.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| APEX-Agents | 67.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Frontier Finance | 58.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HANDBOOK.md | 44.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 79.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Business Operation | 37.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Financial Modeling | 57.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Financial Research | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Kimi Hallu Bench Hard (tools) | 8.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 20.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MazeBench | 2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.1 | 79.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K3.1 Pro | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 75.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench (binary) | 31.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Kimi Code Bench v2 | 77.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Kimi Code Bench 3.0 Long-horizon | 61.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| sweMarathon | 51.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PostTrainBench v1.2 | 36.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 36.0 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: 98 (#1/58)
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: 19.6 (Unranked · 19 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Kimi K3.1 Pro | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| OfficeQA Pro | 67.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OfficeQA Pro v2 | 64.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD Vision2Code (no tools) | 0.728 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BenchCAD Vision2Code (tools) | 0.927 | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.1% | 45.7% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| MMMU-Pro w/ Python | 90% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 93.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | 89% | 70.2% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Chartography (tools) | 90.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BabyVision w/ Python | 95.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench | 39.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ZeroBench w/ Python | 63.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GDP.pdf (Gemini judge) | 34.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GDP.pdf w/ Python (Gemini judge) | 85.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PerceptionBench | 68.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 79.3% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 36.3% | Coming soon |
| CountBench | Coming soon | 93.0% | Coming soon |
| MMMU | Coming soon | 55.7% | Coming soon |
| OCRBench V2 | Coming soon | 63.5% | Coming soon |
| RefCOCO (avg) | Coming soon | 90.5% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 86.4% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 51.6% | Coming soon |
| DynaMath | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |
| We-Math | Coming soon | 68.6% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 48.2% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 55.5% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 41.2% | Coming soon |
| MLVU (M-Avg) | Coming soon | 71.3% | Coming soon |
| MMVU | Coming soon | 52.9% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle) | Coming soon | 62.8% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | Coming soon | 69.0% | Coming soon |
| VideoMMMU | Coming soon | 49.6% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K3.1 Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- LFM3-VL-2B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K3.1 Pro | LFM3-VL-2B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 94.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 70% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | 51.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Kimi Hallu Bench | 5.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Kimi K3.1 Pro and LFM3-VL-2B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-kimi-3-1-pro)
- [LFM3-VL-2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm3-vl-2b)
- [Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-kimi-3-1-pro)
- [LFM3-VL-2B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-lfm3-vl-2b)

## Explore More

- [Kimi K3.1 Pro profile](/models/kimi-3-1-pro)
- [LFM3-VL-2B profile](/models/lfm3-vl-2b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)