# Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Moonshot AI | InclusionAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 49.26 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 38.5 (Supported · #73/132)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Kimi Claw 24/7 | 46.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 76% | 75.6% | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| MCP Mark Verified | 81.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 67.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 80.2% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 90.8% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 57.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 41.7 (Supported · #64/153)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Kimi Code Bench v2 | 62.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | 53.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MLS-Bench Lite | 35.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CursorBench 3.2 | 49.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OpenHarmony Bench | 52.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 78.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 79.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 54.2 (Estimated · #66/187)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | Coming soon | 54.3% | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | Coming soon | 51.0% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 76.6 (#66/152)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Kimi K2.7 Code public-lane score: 58.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 54.035% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | 12.195% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Sante?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/kimi-k2-7-code-vs-ling-3-0-flash)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)

## Explore More

- [Kimi K2.7 Code profile](/models/kimi-k2-7-code)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)