# LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.5

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-2.6B and MiMo-V2.5 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-2.6B and MiMo-V2.5 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Xiaomi |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 39.9 | 57.78 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37.2 (Estimated · #131/154)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 49.8 (Estimated · #61/154)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BFCL v4 | 56.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 5.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 62.9% | 62.3% | LFM2.5-2.6B |
| PinchBench | 68.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MM-ClawBench | Coming soon | 23.8% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 46.89% | Coming soon |
| ResearchClawBench | Coming soon | 16.9% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 60.7% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 39.2 (Estimated · #125/154)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 43.5 (Supported · #103/154)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 59.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 56.1% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 65.8% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 81.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 59.1 (#29/48)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 81% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 77.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 24.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 37 (Estimated · #151/184)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 52.5 (Estimated · #67/184)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 81.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.9% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 38.1 (#104/124)
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 59.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 51.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-2.6B and MiMo-V2.5?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-5)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-2.6B profile](/models/lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [MiMo-V2.5 profile](/models/mimo-v2-5)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)