# LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-2.6B and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-2-6b-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: September 24, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-2.6B and Muse Glimmer 30B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger published context window at 131K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 32.72 | 41.73 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 19.7 (Estimated · #87/105)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 27.6 (Estimated · #72/105)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BFCL v4 | 56.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 5.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 62.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | 68.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 19.8 (Estimated · #118/135)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 36.3 (Estimated · #69/135)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 59.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 26 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 79.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 46.3 (#42/50)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 27.9 (Estimated · #142/158)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43.9 (Estimated · #75/158)

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: 38.1 (#104/124)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 77.7 (#55/124)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 59.2% | 77% | Muse Glimmer 30B |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-2.6B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-2.6B | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 51.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-2.6B and Muse Glimmer 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [LFM2.5-2.6B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-2.6B profile](/models/lfm2-5-2-6b)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)