# LFM2.5-230M vs o1-pro

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-230M and o1-pro across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-230m-vs-o1-pro
- Last updated: September 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-230M and o1-pro share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM2.5-230M has the lower published output-token price.
- o1-pro has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-230M | o1-pro |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | OpenAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 32K | 200K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 35.65 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 1 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $150.00 / $600.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-230M public-lane score: Coming soon
- o1-pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-230M | o1-pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BFCL v4 | 21.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-230M public-lane score: Coming soon
- o1-pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-230M | o1-pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 25.4% | 79% | o1-pro |
| GPQA-D | 25.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | 20.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-230M public-lane score: 10.4 (#123/124)
- o1-pro public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-230M | o1-pro | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 71.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFBench | 38.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-230M and o1-pro?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-230M vs o1](/compare/lfm2-5-230m-vs-o1)
- [o1-pro vs o1](/compare/o1-vs-o1-pro)
- [LFM2.5-230M vs o1-preview](/compare/lfm2-5-230m-vs-o1-preview)
- [o1-pro vs o1-preview](/compare/o1-preview-vs-o1-pro)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-230M profile](/models/lfm2-5-230m)
- [o1-pro profile](/models/o1-pro)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)